<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Cloud 9 Minus One &#187; Bollywood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sangeetamall.com/tag/bollywood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sangeetamall.com</link>
	<description>Do Read My Book</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 05:22:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Missionary Position</title>
		<link>http://www.sangeetamall.com/2010/02/06/the-missionary-position/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sangeetamall.com/2010/02/06/the-missionary-position/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 06:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sangeetamall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ishqiya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[woman power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sangeetamall.wordpress.com/?p=98</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don’t know if the missionary position in sex is all that charming. A man lies on top of the female form, practically crushing her with his weight, and expects her to enjoy it. Frankly it is wrong physics. It is wrong sociology as well. Man on top is no longer all that prevalent or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t know if the missionary position in sex is all that charming. A man lies on top of the female form, practically crushing her with his weight, and expects her to enjoy it. Frankly it is wrong physics.<span id="more-98"></span> It is wrong sociology as well. Man on top is no longer all that prevalent or acceptable, at least not in societies where women have been given a say in the matter. As an example, in the US, there will be more female than male college enrolments next year. 22 percent of the women draw higher salaries than their male partners as against 7 percent just a few years ago. With these kind of statistics we can possibly conclude that the feminist revolution in the West has reached a turning point, and women need no longer remain in a subordinate position. They have a long way to go, of course, but the route looks shorter now.</p>
<p>In India, the route still tends to stretch to infinity. At least in Bollywood it does. ‘Strong’ women in our Hindi films avenge rape and violence with more violence or an evangelical zeal to convert the violator. So either we have cute little Cinderellas, going along with the male agenda, as in 3 Idiots, or we have harridans as in scores of B films. Very rarely do we have a woman who is BOSS. That is why Ishqiya is worth watching. From the word go, we know that Vidya Balan is a woman on top. On top of the issues that confront her. She knows how to string along the men at every step. Ishqiya makes one believe in change, and have faith in the future of our film industry, that it will learn to move in step with the rest of this country. Women in India are no longer willing to lie down and be stroked by their men. And Ishqiya shows that reality marvellously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sangeetamall.com/2010/02/06/the-missionary-position/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bollywood &#039;S&#8211;t&#039;!</title>
		<link>http://www.sangeetamall.com/2009/10/26/bollywood-s-t/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sangeetamall.com/2009/10/26/bollywood-s-t/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sangeetamall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rubbish TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sangeetamall.wordpress.com/?p=71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After seeing Julie and Julia, my husband and I got into a real, shirt-sleeves-rolled-up-jackets-off-take-no-prisoners fight over why Bollywood is incapable of making such movies. Ratna Pathak Shah’s words at the Bombay launch were reverberating in my ears. She had loudly declared to an appalled audience that she felt ashamed that Bollywood was now the face [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After seeing <em>Julie and Julia</em>, my husband and I got into a real, shirt-sleeves-rolled-up-jackets-off-take-no-prisoners fight over why Bollywood is incapable of making such movies. Ratna Pathak Shah’s words at the Bombay launch were reverberating in my ears.<span id="more-71"></span> She had loudly declared to an appalled audience that she felt ashamed that Bollywood was now the face of India, considering that it produced such ‘s—t’, and she didn’t put these dashes, she said the word out loud.</p>
<p>I agree with her fully. Why can’t we do some homework before rushing to the hall of fame? Why can’t we make well-directed, well-scripted, well-acted software? Why do we have such few Pankaj Kapurs, Naseeruddin Shahs, Seema Biswas’s? Why do we always, but always, depend on good old histrionics and action stunts to see our movies and TV programs through? And why, oh why, don’t we demand anything better?</p>
<p>Nora Ephron, the director of <em>Julie and Julia</em>, is certainly not one of Hollywood’s best directors, and Hollywood is certainly not the best where world cinema is concerned, yet the movie was a treat to watch. We saw actual shots of food being cooked, we saw actual shots of Julia Child, we had a genius called Meryl Streep who literally became the celebrity cook, we had 1950s atmosphere recreated, we got a feel of what the infamous McCarthyism was like back then, and all because someone had spent at least a year writing the script, going over the details meticulously, doing their research, showing publishers, cordon bleu cooks, railway porters <em>as they actually are!</em></p>
<p>Hindi television, if that is at all possible, is even worse than Hindi cinema. The best-selling soap, <em>Baalika Badhoo</em>, shows a village granny in Rajasthan sitting at a dining table eating out of china! Just a slight inquiry would reveal that Rajasthani women of that generation eschew china as being unclean and casteless.</p>
<p>I can continue this rant forever, but I won’t for fear of boring my readers. The bright light on the horizon is the proliferation of Indian writing that veers to the realistic, rather than the idealised, and the easy accessibility to world-class entertainment, which will surely open our eyes to the possibilities that exist out there if only we can get off our lazy asses and grab them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sangeetamall.com/2009/10/26/bollywood-s-t/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

